The Moment a Company Becomes Something Else
I have found that growth changes a company in ways that are easy to quantify on a spreadsheet, but much harder to see until the experience itself begins to feel different.
Early on, start-up decisions are guided by instinct, experience, and a very clear sense of what the company stands for. The founder is close enough to the work and the people to shape strategy and the thousands of small choices that ultimately define the experience. As companies grow, that dynamic inevitably changes. Scale introduces structure and processes. And over time, decision-making becomes more distributed and often more efficient. None of this is inherently negative, and in many cases, it is necessary.
But it does raise a question that I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about both as a founder in the hospitality sector and as someone who has gone through the process of selling a company:
What happens to a hospitality-driven business when the person who originally defined its standards is no longer shaping them every day?
When Howard Schultz stepped away from Starbucks in 2000, the company continued to grow and evolve. Operationally, systems were refined, processes more consistent, and the business scaled in ways that would have been difficult in its earlier stages.
I followed this carefully and was struck when Schultz himself spoke openly about the gradual customer experience shift that occurred during that period. The connection to what made Starbucks distinctive in its early days became less pronounced, not because of a single decision, but because of many small ones that moved the brand in a different direction over time. When Shultz returned in 2008, it was less about fixing a broken business and more about restoring something that had become diluted.
Research consistently shows that founder-led companies tend to outperform their peers over time, in large part because of the clarity, conviction, and consistency that founders bring to decision-making. That influence is not just strategic; it shows up in the day-to-day experience. As founder proximity changes, the standards that were once reinforced through direct involvement begin to rely on interpretation. Not from lack of intent, but from distance.
That dynamic becomes most visible in businesses where execution must match founder philosophy at scale. Consider how this played out at Chipotle Mexican Grill under Steve Ells. The QSR concept was innovative at the time and built on a clear culinary philosophy grounded in fresh ingredients, simple preparation, and a strong point of view about food quality. But as the company scaled rapidly, that philosophy became harder to execute consistently across a growing footprint.
Operational inconsistencies and food safety issues emerged, and the brand had to work deliberately to rebuild trust and re-establish its standards. It was a clear reminder to me that when founder-driven standards are not reinforced with the same intensity, even strong concepts can drift in ways that are difficult and costly to correct.
Fortunately, there are examples of founder-led companies that have maintained their standards at scale. Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts under Isadore Sharp is one of them. Four Seasons grew from a single hotel into a global luxury brand, expanding across markets and cultures while consistently delivering a highly personalized guest experience.
What made it work was not just a strong founding philosophy, but how deliberately it was operationalized. The company’s “Golden Rule” was embedded into hiring, training, and daily decision-making. Sharp himself remained deeply engaged, staying close to the actual experience and not just the performance of the business. Leaders were developed to reinforce standards consistently, and employees were trusted and empowered to act in service of the guest experience in real time.
The result was a company that scaled successfully without losing the essence of what made it distinctive. The Four Seasons demonstrates that maintaining a founder’s standard at scale is possible, but only when that standard is actively taught, reinforced, and protected by leaders who remain close enough to the experience to uphold it.
I have seen these dynamics from a distance, and I have also experienced them firsthand. When I sold the hospitality companies I founded, it was with a clear understanding of the opportunities that would come with broader scale and resources. And in many respects, those opportunities were realized.
I also believed that we had built a culture strong enough and developed leaders capable enough to carry forward the culture and standards that had defined the company. But what became clear over time was that the culture was not being continually reinforced in the daily decisions; the ones that rarely show up in a playbook. Most critically, the willingness to make hard choices because they align with the brand’s conviction was lost.
In recent years, I’ve had the opportunity to reconnect with a number of organizations that I worked with in the past. Many are taking a fresh look at their dining programs as part of the strategic planning process. It seems regardless of the sector, dining services are no longer being viewed as a support function; instead, they are seen as essential culture and performance drivers.
My conversations are generally centered on a growing recognition that resident expectations have dramatically evolved, and in most cases, the current provider or on-site team is not delivering an experience that has kept pace with those expectations. Business leaders recognize that the difference between good and exceptional dining is rarely defined by systems alone. It is defined by consistency of standards and a crystal-clear point of view about what the experience should be. And as history shows, those elements require ongoing attention from accessible and engaged founders and leaders. Because, ultimately, this is the reality:
The moment no one is left to say, “That’s not who we are,” the company starts becoming something else.
Richard B. Schenkel, Founder and CEO of Phoenix3 Collective LLC











