A spectral setting with silhouetted beings.

Beyond Artificial Intelligence: The Human Advantage Great Leaders Will Always Own

/in /by

One of the advantages of traveling to the same city often is that you begin to notice the difference between service and genuine hospitality. When I travel to Chicago, I generally stay at the same hotel and have a simple morning routine. Before heading into meetings, I stop in the dining room for coffee and breakfast, bringing my own packet of oatmeal and asking for a cup of hot water.

Not too long ago, before I had the chance to ask, someone quietly placed a cup of hot water on my table. There was no fanfare or scripted interaction. Someone had simply paid attention. They noticed a pattern, remembered my preference, and anticipated my need before I had to ask.

What made that small gesture so memorable had nothing to do with the hot water itself and everything to do with what it represented. Someone took a small piece of information and turned it into a meaningful experience. They didn’t simply remember a fact; they understood its significance and acted on it.

That is the difference between collecting information and creating value. It is also one of the most important distinctions leaders must understand as artificial intelligence reshapes the way organizations operate. AI will improve forecasting, accelerate decision-making, automate repetitive work, and uncover patterns that were once difficult to recognize. Those capabilities will become increasingly powerful and widely available. But technology alone will never create lasting competitive advantage.

The organizations that stand apart will be led by people who know how to apply technology with judgment, perspective, and purpose.

The Real Opportunity for Artificial Intelligence

Much of today’s conversation about artificial intelligence centers on efficiency by reducing costs, automating repetitive work, and improving productivity. Those benefits are real, and organizations that ignore them risk falling behind.

But history tells us that technology alone rarely creates lasting advantage. Email, cloud computing, and mobile technology all followed the same path. Each transformed business before eventually becoming commonplace. Artificial intelligence will be no different. As AI becomes more accessible, organizations will have access to many of the same capabilities. The real differentiator will not be who owns the technology, but who uses it more effectively.

In my opinion, the greatest opportunity AI offers is not simply helping organizations do things faster. It’s true value lies in helping leaders recognize opportunities sooner, anticipate challenges earlier, and make better-informed decisions. The organizations that create the greatest advantage will be those that use AI to strengthen human judgment, not replace it. The question is not, “How can AI replace work?” but rather, “How can AI help our people think better and create better outcomes?”

As leaders, our responsibility is to create a culture where people are expected and empowered to use technology intelligence to solve problems creatively and create experiences that customers remember, whether they’re installing a new software system or making a specialty cocktail.

Information Does Not Create Experience. People Do.

My Chicago hotel undoubtedly has information about me, including my reservation history, loyalty status, and travel patterns. But none of that information created a memorable experience. The experience was created because someone understood what the information meant and chose to act on it. That distinction is where many organizations miss the opportunity with technology.

Data is simply potential. It becomes valuable only when people use it to improve decisions, solve problems, strengthen relationships, or anticipate needs. Hospitality has understood this principle for generations. Great hotels remember the small preferences that make a stay feel personal like a room on a higher floor, a favorite pillow, or a cup of hot water waiting at breakfast. Exceptional restaurants remember guests’ favorite table, preferred wine, or dietary preferences, turning routine transactions into relationships.

The same principle applies in every industry. Data can help leaders see what they couldn’t see before, whether that’s a production issue, market trends, or changing buying patterns. But information by itself has never created trust, solved a meaningful problem, or delivered an experience people remember. That happens when leaders build organizations where people are empowered to act on what they know.

AI Should Amplify Leadership Not Replace It

One of AI’s greatest contributions will be helping organizations capture and share knowledge more effectively. Every company develops valuable insight through customer relationships, operational experience, successes, failures, and countless everyday decisions. Too often, however, that knowledge remains scattered across departments or exists only in the minds of experienced employees.

AI can now help us connect those insights, identify patterns, and make institutional knowledge more accessible throughout an organization.  It will reveal trends and even generate recommendations. But leaders must determine what those insights mean and how they should influence decisions. The reality is that artificial intelligence will make leadership even more important as the strongest organizations find ways to use it to amplify human capability by combining analytics with sound judgment.

The New Leadership Advantage: Asking Better Questions

As AI becomes part of everyday business, leaders will have access to more information than ever before. Their advantage will come from knowing which questions to ask, which insights truly matter, and what actions should follow.

An AI system may predict that a key customer is at risk of leaving, but a leader still has to determine why and decide how to rebuild the relationship. A high-performing employee might be flagged for declining output, but a manager must understand whether the issue is burnout, a lack of challenge, or something happening outside of work. In manufacturing, AI can predict that a critical piece of equipment is likely to fail, but leaders have to decide whether to invest proactively or accept the risk.

Great leaders will know when to trust AI-generated insights and when experience and human understanding should guide the final decision. As AI becomes commonplace, fierce curiosity and sound judgement will increasingly distinguish exceptional leaders from merely competent managers.

The Hot Water Test: A Leadership Framework for the AI Era

When I think about technology’s role in business, I return to that morning in Chicago. The hotel did not create a memorable experience because it possessed more customer data than anyone else. It created one because someone noticed something meaningful and acted on it.

That simple moment offers a valuable framework for evaluating artificial intelligence. Before investing in AI, leaders should ask three questions:

  1. Does this help us see something we could not previously see? AI should expand awareness and uncover insights that improve decision-making.
  2. Does this help our people make better decisions? Information creates value only when it changes behavior and improves outcomes.
  3. Does this create a better experience? The ultimate measure of technology is whether customers, employees, residents, and partners are better served because of it.

That is the Hot Water Test. Years from now, customers will not remember the algorithm behind an interaction. They will remember whether an organization understood them, anticipated their needs, and made them feel genuinely valued.

The reason I’ll remember that simple cup of hot water is because someone chose to turn information into a meaningful experience. No matter how intelligent our systems become, the greatest advantage leaders will always own is the ability to turn understanding into action.

Richard B. Schenkel, Founder and CEO of Phoenix3 Collective LLC

The Real Product Every Dining Program Sells Isn’t Food. It’s Confidence.

/in , /by

A student doesn’t transfer because the pasta was overcooked once.

A resident’s family doesn’t pull them off a waitlist because of one bad dinner review.

A patient doesn’t choose a different hospital system because a tray arrived cold.

They leave, or never arrive, because somewhere along the way, they stopped trusting that the standard would hold. One bad meal is an incident. A pattern of bad meals, inconsistent service, or unaddressed complaints is something else entirely: a slow leak of confidence. And once confidence goes, it rarely comes back through an apology. It comes back through proof.

This is the thread connecting every sector we work in.

Higher education, senior living, healthcare, corporate dining, all with different populations, different regulators, different stakes. But strip away the context and the failure mode is identical: an institution assumes its dining program is delivering on its promises, while the people eating there quietly decide whether to believe it.

The data says the gap is real. And it’s public

In higher ed, dining is no longer a soft amenity. It’s a searchable, published grade. Niche scores over 1,000 institutions annually on food quality, drawing on nearly 500,000 student reviews. A “C,” “D,” or “F” doesn’t stay internal; it sits next to safety scores and academic rankings for every prospective family to see. And the confidence gap shows up starkly in the numbers: only about 1 in 4 students say their college is “getting dining options right.” Just 15% are enthusiastic about their wellness and dining offerings. Meanwhile, 54% of students say dining directly influenced whether they stayed enrolled.

In senior living, the same pattern shows up in different language. J.D. Power found dining drove one of the largest satisfaction swings of any category, up 11 points one year, dragging independent living scores down the next when performance slipped. 39% of prospective residents name high-end dining as a key factor in choosing a community, and adult children – the ones actually making the placement decision for a parent – treat the dining room as a proxy for the quality of care happening everywhere else in the building.

Healthcare and corporate dining tell the same story with different vocabulary: patient satisfaction scores, employee engagement surveys, retention metrics. The mechanism doesn’t change. Confidence is built meal by meal, and lost the same way.

Why the gap exists. And why it’s structural, not a failure of effort

None of this happens because operators don’t care. Culinary directors get hired. Brand standards get written. Beautiful dining rooms get built. The gap opens anyway, because:

  • Managers can’t be everywhere, every shift, every service period.
  • Contract partners have their own priorities, and self-reporting has an inherent conflict of interest.
  • Staff turnover means institutional knowledge is constantly being rebuilt from scratch.
  • Problems surface in satisfaction surveys or public reviews — which is the worst possible place to find out, because by then the confidence is already gone and the review is already permanent.

Internal reporting is valuable. It is also, by definition, not independent. An institution grading its own homework is not the same as a family, a prospective student, or a resident’s adult child deciding whether to trust what they’ve been told.

Confidence has to be demonstrated, not asserted

This is the case for independent quality assurance, not as an audit that produces a binder nobody reads, but as an ongoing, objective measurement system that catches drift before it becomes a review, a transfer, or an empty bed.

This is exactly the gap CrossCheck was built to close. By pairing a configurable QA intelligence platform with trained, independent, on-site evaluators, CrossCheck gives leadership something internal surveys and vendor self-reporting can’t: an unbiased, continuous read on whether the experience being delivered actually matches the standard being promised. Not a verdict but a catalyst. Data that tells a team what to fix, why it matters, and how to prove it’s fixed.

Whether the population is 18-year-old students choosing a school, 80-year-old residents choosing a community, patients choosing where to return for care, or employees deciding whether to stay, the underlying question is the same one leadership should be asking itself:

If someone challenged our dining program’s reputation today, could we prove, independently, objectively, that it’s earned?

If the honest answer is “we assume so,” that’s the gap worth closing.

Eric Healy is the CEO of CrossCheck Quality Assurance. CrossCheck partners with organizations across higher education, senior living, healthcare, and corporate dining to provide independent, on-site quality assurance.